Donald Trump has made an announcement that the National Guard will be taking to the streets for the next 30 days.

Calls for the US president’s impeachment have increased in response to his “evil” announcement about policing the country.

After meeting with authorities to discuss ways to make the capital “safer and more beautiful,” Trump presented a radical plan on August 11 to tackle what he views as out-of-control crime around Washington, D.C.

In his broad initiative to clean up the streets, the president warned that there would be no “Mr Nice Guy” and instructed the homeless to “move out IMMEDIATELY.”

It was the world’s most beautiful capital before the tents, dirt, misery, and crime.

On his Truth Social platform, he remarked, “It will soon be that again.”

In light of this, there were concerns that the president would use the National Guard in a violent crackdown, similar to what he did recently in Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration sweeps.

Trump’s declaration of a “public safety emergency” in Washington, characterizing the city as a “sanctuary for illegal alien criminals” that has become so tainted by “lawlessness” that it has become “one of the most dangerous cities in the world,” with homicide rates higher than those of places like Bogotá or Mexico City, has now confirmed those very fears.

“Uncomfortable and unheard of”

The 79-year-old persisted in invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, confirming a federal takeover of DC’s Metropolitan police, despite the fact that his declaration contradicts official statistics showing violent crime in the city had reached a 30-year low.

However, many have criticized the risky precedent he seemed to set when he claimed that officers may now “do whatever the hell they want” in response to animosity in the city.

“That is the only language they [alleged criminals] understand,” Trump stated during the press conference.

They enjoy spitting in the face of law enforcement.

They can hit really hard, and we can hit after you spit.

“I’ve been witnessing this for years; it’s a disgusting thing: police are told to do nothing, and people are spitting in their faces, but now they are free to do whatever the hell they want.”

“While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented, I can’t say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past, that we’re totally surprised,” said Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington, D.C., in response to the news on Monday.

“A road map, not a slippery slope.”

Reddit users responded to the announcement by calling the initiative sinister and writing: “The Trump police state is upon us.”

“Whoa, what a nasty jerk.

“F*** you, Trump supporters,” another person added.

A third comment said, “What a failure, impeachment immediately.”

The initiative is getting closer to police state violence against citizens, according to a fourth individual.

“Trump is normalizing the notion that police officers require extra special authorization to crack some skulls because they are frequently the targets of physical assault.

“Police have never been advised that they must allow citizens to spit on them.

This is just not something that has ever occurred.

It is theft to use it as an excuse to escalate governmental aggression.

“It’s not going to get slippery.”

It’s a road map,” they added.

“This is liberation day in DC and we’re going to take our capital back,” Trump asserts, claiming he has been compelled to take such “historic action” in order to “rescue” the city from “crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.”

800 National Guard soldiers are anticipated to be on the streets during the 30-day takeover.

Was it illegal for Trump to use the National Guard to quell protests in Los Angeles?

This occurs as evidence is being presented to a federal judge in San Francisco over whether Trump violated the law when he used the National Guard to quell immigration protesters in California in June.

Three hundred troops of the National Guard remain after 5,000 were sent to Los Angeles in June.

It was the 1st time in 60 years a president has done this without a state governor’s assent.

Judge Charles Breyer said the court must evaluate ‘whether the military was deployed to enforce domestic law, and if so, whether there remains to be a fear that it could be done again’.

“It simply is not the law that Defendants may deploy standing armies to the streets of California while California is powerless to do anything about that clear violation of the most fundamental principles of our Nation’s founding,” the State of California stated in a court filing.

The Trump administration claims that the statutes specifically support the National Guard’s engagement.