“Historic 100–0 Senate Vote: How the ‘No Tax on Tips Act’ Could Transform the Lives of Millions of American Workers

The United States Senate passed the historic “No Tax on Tips Act,” spearheaded by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), 100-0, in a rare display of unanimity. Former President Donald Trump had initially pledged the legislation during his 2024 campaign.

This proposal would be one of the most worker-focused tax reforms in modern history if it were to become law, exempting all tips—cash, credit, or pooled—from federal income taxation.

Millions of Americans in tipped occupations, like as waiters, bartenders, delivery drivers, salon employees, hotel staff, and ride-share drivers, whose livelihoods rely on gratuities, will receive significant relief from the bill.

After the vote, Cruz said, “This is a game-changer for blue-collar Americans.” “The diligent men and women who work in service sectors have been unfairly burdened with taxes on the money they earned by providing exceptional service for far too long. Fairness is restored by this bill.

In the hyperpartisan Washington of today, the legislation’s unanimous 100-0 passage is practically unprecedented. In addition to providing millions of Americans with a cash lifeline, it is a symbolic win for working Americans who frequently feel ignored by decision-makers.

The Real Function of the “No Tax on Tips Act”

Fundamentally, employees in traditionally tipped occupations are permitted to fully deduct up to $25,000 in tips from their annual federal taxable income under the No Tax on Tips Act.

This implies that if you receive $20,000 in tips on top of $45,000 in base pay, your taxable income would decrease to $45,000 rather than $65,000, so removing the $20,000 in federal income taxes.

The goal of the program is to increase the amount of money that workers, particularly those who are living paycheck to paycheck at a period of record inflation and rising living expenses, get.

The following are the main clauses:

Under the Senate version, annual untaxed tips could reach $25,000.

Income phase-outs for higher earners: For individuals making over $150,000 and married couples making over $300,000, the deduction starts to decline.

List of qualifying occupations: The U.S. Treasury Secretary is required to release an official list of occupations that qualify for the exemption within ninety days of its implementation. This list must only include those that “customarily and regularly receive tips” before December 31, 2024.

Anti-abuse clause: After 2024, employers are not allowed to reclassify non-tipped jobs in order to be eligible for the payment.

In order to ensure that the tax credit reaches servers, bartenders, baristas, bellhops, hair stylists, delivery workers, and other legitimate tipped employees and not high-income CEOs or gig workers trying to take advantage of the system, the policy is meticulously designed to prevent loopholes.

Reasons for Its Unanimous Passage

In an era of political divide, a vote of 100 to 0 is truly historic. Why, therefore, did this one pass with no votes against it?

Strong Public Support: A sizable percentage of American workers are tippers, particularly in the hospitality, restaurant, and personal service sectors. The initiative received overwhelmingly positive popular support from both parties.

Economic Relief Without Bureaucracy: This bill offers immediate assistance without the need for additional government funding or bureaucratic red tape, in contrast to intricate subsidy schemes. It merely allows employees to retain a larger portion of their own profits.

Political Optics: It is politically safe to support delivery drivers, bartenders, and waiters. “I voted to let you keep your tips,” any senator, Republican or Democrat, could tell their people when they got home.

Bipartisan Framing: Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) openly endorsed the plan, despite it being spearheaded by Senator Cruz and backed by former President Trump. Nevada’s economy, which is mostly dependent on the hospitality industry, stands to benefit greatly, Rosen underlined.

This is a worker issue, not a Republican or Democratic one, as Senator Cruz stated. Every American who makes a decent income is entitled to keep their earnings.

The Implications for America’s Tipping Workers

This law could significantly alter the financial stability of millions of workers in the hospitality industry, including bartenders, delivery drivers, restaurant servers, and beauty salon personnel.

Let’s look at few instances:

Example 1: Sarah, a Texas waitress.
Sarah receives about $1,800 in tips each month in addition to her base income of $2.13 per hour, which is the federal tipped minimum wage.

The new law would exempt those tips from federal taxation. Depending on her tax bracket, that may save her between $2,000 and $3,000 in federal taxes over the course of a year.

Case 2: New York City bartender Marcus.

Every year, Marcus receives $25,000 in tips. His taxable income significantly decreases with the new $25,000 exemption, potentially saving him more than $5,000 in taxes annually.

Case 3: Dana, a California hairdresser.

Dana divides her earnings between tips and pay. Her net income stabilizes as a result of the exemption, which enables her make up for the hours she lost during sluggish months.

For workers like these, who frequently balance childcare, groceries, and rent on erratic salaries, even a few hundred dollars more each month can make the difference between stability and financial stress.
⚖️ Variations The differences between the Senate and House versions

Prior to the measure reaching the president’s desk, certain significant discrepancies must be resolved, even though the House of Representatives has passed its own version earlier this year.

Instead of concentrating relief on higher-income individuals who could occasionally receive tips (such as consultants or real estate agents), the Senate version is more carefully regulated and targets working-class Americans.

Legislators are anticipated to combine the two into a compromise plan that maintains equity without opening any loopholes, even if the House version is more generous.

Industry Voices

Following the vote, the service and hospitality sectors exploded in celebration.
It was dubbed a “historic moment for the people who make American hospitality possible” by the National Restaurant Association.

According to Michele Gonzalez, a spokesman for a significant restaurant coalition, “this bill recognizes that tips are a reward for good service — not income to be taxed.”

“This type of fairness has been requested by our servers and bartenders for decades.”

The news was hailed even by small business owners.

The change may aid in employee retention, according to Maria Hernandez, owner of a family eatery in Phoenix.Family-friendly games

“Financial stress has caused me to lose excellent employees,” she stated. “Maybe if this goes through, they’ll feel like their efforts are literally paying off.”

The sentiment is widespread in the nation. Many people see this regulation as confirmation that service work is legitimate labor that merits respect and alleviation.

The Bigger Picture: Working Class Tax Fairness

In addition to altering the taxation of gratuities, the “No Tax on Tips Act” addresses a more pervasive economic and cultural disparity in the United States.

Tipping workers have been in a gray area for decades; while they are officially considered “employees,” they frequently make less than the minimum wage and depend on the kindness of their customers to make ends meet.

Despite the fact that they frequently receive no benefits, job security, or steady pay, the tax system has historically considered their tips as taxable income.

Supporters claim that this law starts to make amends for that injustice.

This is how Georgetown University economist Rachel Meyers puts it:

This law is both substantive and symbolic. It shows that our service economy’s inherent inequality is finally being recognized by legislators.

Additionally, she points out that lowering taxes may boost local economies since employees will spend more of their income on local goods and services, which will spur growth.

The Reactions of Critics

Though criticism has been less severe than in most significant tax debates, not everyone is entirely on board.

Even though tips must still be documented, some economists caution that untaxed tips may make it more difficult for the IRS to enforce the law or may even incite underreporting.

Others wonder if the legislation unfairly favors some areas, including those with a high concentration of hospitality, like Nevada, Florida, or California, while ignoring manufacturing or white-collar jobs.

Concerns have also been raised over the effect on federal revenue.

According to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysts, excluding tips from income tax might result in a $6–8 billion yearly decrease in federal tax collection.

However, supporters contend that over time, a large portion of that loss might be recovered by increases in worker expenditure, job retention, and compliance.

In response to criticism, Senator Cruz stated, “When people have more disposable income, they don’t hoard it — they spend it.” “Local economies thrive because of that spending.”

What Comes Next: The Road to Legal Status

The bill is now sent to the House of Representatives for reconciliation following its historic Senate passage.

Most observers anticipate a quick ratification because the House had already passed a version that was comparable earlier in the year and because the topic has broad bipartisan appeal.

Following its completion, the reconciled bill will be sent to the White House for the president’s signature.
Although President Biden has not yet made a formal declaration, analysts believe he is unlikely to veto the bill because of its broad support and working-class focus.

Millions of tipped workers might begin to notice increases in their take-home pay as early as the next tax season if the measure is signed into law, which would take effect on January 1 of the next fiscal year.

The Effect of Economic Ripples

Experts predict that this act may have long-term economic effects on the service sector and the American job market in addition to providing individual relief.

Increased Consumer Spending: Employees are more likely to spend locally when they have more money in their pockets, which helps small businesses.

Labor Shortage Relief: The hospitality industry, which is still getting over its post-pandemic staffing shortages, may attract more new employees.

Wage Stability: If employees’ total compensation increases due to tax relief, employers might not feel as pressured to boost base pay.

Inflation Neutral: Economists do not anticipate that the bill would increase inflation because it does not include additional government expenditure or subsidies.

The policy is “a clever form of stimulus that doesn’t cost the Treasury in upfront spending,” according to Dr. Alan Wright, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

“It corrects itself,” he clarified. “You give people the freedom to work, reward them for providing high-quality services, and naturally distribute wealth.”

A Seldom Occurring Unity in Washington

The collaborative spirit that underpins this legislation may be its most remarkable feature, rather than the specifics of its policies.

The vote of 100 to 0 is a rare and welcome consensus in a time when most bills barely receive 60 votes in the Senate. The result was hailed by lawmakers from both parties as evidence that the nation can still be brought together by common-sense measures.

The greatest summary was provided by Senator Jacky Rosen:

This is one of those times when individuals came before politics. You cannot overlook the struggles faced by servers, bartenders, and delivery personnel in your state.

It was a personal moment for Senator Cruz.

“This vote shows that Washington can still work for ordinary Americans when it wants to,” he told reporters as he stood outside the Senate chamber. Tonight, every senator—Republican and Democrat alike—defended workers.

Workers’ Perspectives: What They Have to Say

Service workers’ responses on social media have been largely positive.

One bartender in Las Vegas tweeted, “At last, someone took notice of us.”
“My tips, the only portion of my income that I control, have been taxed like everything else, and it has always felt unfair to me as someone who has worked in restaurants for ten years.”

Similar opinions were expressed on Reddit by waiters and delivery drivers, who referred to the measure as “life-changing” and “the best thing to happen to restaurant workers in decades.”

Even delivery and ride-sharing employees, who work in the expanding gig economy, voiced cautious optimism; nonetheless, their inclusion will rely on the Treasury’s definition of “tipped professions.”

A Promise Fulfilled — and a Prospective Inquiry

For outgoing President Donald Trump, this law is a rare example of a campaign promise turning into a bipartisan legislative win, as it fulfills one of his 2024 campaign promises.

It solidifies Senator Cruz’s reputation as a champion of working-class reform, uniting fiscal conservative and populist ideologies.

Additionally, it represents something much more significant to the millions of tipped workers in America: relief, respect, and acknowledgment.

One thing is certain as the law approaches final passage: In a time of division, this measure has served as a reminder to America of what unity looks like and what it feels like to stand up for those who serve our food, bring our packages, pour our drinks, and generally make our lives a bit simpler.

Concluding Remarks: Moving Past Politics and Toward Equity

Though it may not address all economic issues, the “No Tax on Tips Act” signifies a change in moral standards and a declaration that the system can still benefit common people.

The specifics of tax codes may be lost when history looks back. All that will be left is the uncommon picture of all U.S. senators, including Democrats and Republicans, standing together and declaring:

“You deserve to keep what you’ve earned if you serve others.”

America agreed, 100 to 0, for the first time.

Trouble for Zohran Mamdani: Polling Numbers Crater as Election Day Nears

As election day draws closer, Zohran Mamdani has difficulties as polling numbers deteriorate — A recent survey shows that support for the NYC mayoral favorite has sharply declined as voter skepticism and dissatisfaction with his platform have grown.

The mayoral contest in New York City has taken a significant turn with just over a week to go before Election Day.

Once appearing to be a certain win for Democratic Socialist contender Zohran Mamdani, the race has become more competitive as new polling indicates that former Governor Andrew Cuomo may be gaining ground.

The difference between Mamdani and Cuomo has shrunk from 20 points in September to only 10 points as of Monday, according to a fresh Quinnipiac University survey.

The survey indicates that Cuomo, who is running as an independent, has risen to 34% of probable voters, while Mamdani has 44%.

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is behind with 11%, and 7% of voters are still uncertain.

In the closing stages of one of the most anticipated local elections in the country, the figures indicate that Cuomo is gaining ground.

Analysts attribute the change to a confluence of Mamdani’s increasingly divisive philosophy, a disciplined communications effort, and strategic endorsements.

Even seasoned political analysts have been taken aback by Cuomo’s comeback.

Cuomo, who was once viewed as a holdover from New York’s political history, resigned as governor in 2021 due to controversy and public outrage.

Since then, however, he has made an effort to recast himself as an independent voice for practical governance rather than as a typical Democrat.

“Experience Over Ideology,” his campaign motto, has resonated with independents, centrist Democrats, and older voters who are apprehensive about the city’s radical shift.

The endorsement of Cuomo by Mayor Eric Adams, who had stopped his own candidacy but is still running, earlier this month marked a significant turning point.

The support helped mobilize working-class and centrist voters, especially in Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island, and gave Cuomo’s campaign more respectability.

The candidate “best equipped to tackle crime, affordability, and the dysfunction driving families out of New York” is Cuomo, according to Adams.

Cuomo’s campaign activities seem to have been revitalized by that endorsement.

Previously poorly attended rallies have seen an increase in attendance, and his fundraising totals have increased.

Voters concerned about increased crime, exorbitant rents, and the city’s post-pandemic recovery have responded favorably to his argument, which holds that Mamdani’s ideas are too extreme and economically risky.

Mamdani’s plans have drawn strong criticism from Cuomo, who has warned that they would “turn New York into a test case for utopian socialism.”

Expanded rent control, a wealth tax on high-end property owners, and significant cuts to NYPD spending in favor of social programs are all part of Mamdani’s platform, which has angered moderates but thrilled the activist left.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old Queens state assemblyman and well-known figure in the progressive movement in New York, is still defending his ideas as essential to building a more equitable city.

Tenant rights, affordable housing, and fair economic growth are the main focuses of his campaign.
However, the last several weeks have put his capacity to withstand a barrage of criticism that he is “too extreme” and “too inexperienced” to the test.

Cuomo’s campaign has made extensive use of that storyline.

He questioned Mamdani’s understanding of the city’s intricate governance issues during televised discussions, accusing him of being “a Twitter activist pretending to be a mayor.”

In response, Mamdani has reminded voters of Cuomo’s contentious background, which includes claims of corruption, misbehavior at work, and the events leading up to his resignation in 2021.

However, the latter stages of the election appear to be more characterized by identity and tone than by ideology.

Mamdani would be the first Muslim mayor of New York City and one of the city’s youngest mayors if elected.

His ascent is seen by admirers as a sign of a generational change in urban politics, while detractors question his experience and preparedness.

The challenge facing New Yorkers as the campaign nears its end is not merely one of left vs right, but rather one of stability, trust, and the future of the biggest city in America.

Both candidates are making their final arguments as early voting continues and undecided voters remain available.

It’s an appeal for Mamdani to stick with it and welcome change.
It’s Cuomo’s last attempt to gain notoriety and possibly atonement.

There is no doubt that the results of next week’s polling will be a turning point in the political identity of New York, a city torn between its progressive values and its desire for more stable leadership.