Grandmother’s Gambit: Tales of Boundary-Crossing in Family Bonds

3 Shocking Stories When Mother-in-Laws Crossed the Line with Their Grandchildren

On Reddit, three individuals shared their experiences, indicating that they had disagreements with their mothers-in-law about various topics. The elderly women were criticised for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to the fact that they failed to respect boundaries and caused rifts between their grandkids.

When it comes to their daughters-in-law, some in-laws can be extremely disrespectful, as seen by the following stories. Others of them try to impose their own ideas on the families of their children, while others choose to disobey the regulations and instructions that have been given to them. Continue reading to learn everything there is to know about their inappropriate actions.

The Mother-in-Law Refuses to Reveal Her Daughter-in-Law

On the “AITA” subreddit, a member of Reddit reached out to other users of the platform in the hopes of receiving advice from them. After providing some background information, the woman disclosed that she had issues with her mother-in-law (MIL) for a considerable amount of time prior to the birth of her first kid in August of 2021.

Things became much more difficult with the mother-in-law after the original poster (OP) gave birth to her child. The decision that OP made to stay with her parents after she was discharged from the hospital after giving birth was something that she referred to as a “big mistake in general.” Her mother-in-law was adamant on keeping the kid with her in-laws because she believed it was unjust that they should be able to spend all of their time with the child while she was unable to do so.

Her mother-in-law had boundary issues prior to the birth of the kid, but once the baby was born, those issues grew even more severe. The older woman did not comply with any of the regulations that were established, she kissed the infant on a regular basis, and she did not allow the individual to have any time alone, even if it was to breastfeed or pump milk. The Reddit user added:

“It had gotten so bad that my PPD had become so exacerbated that I wasn’t eating and I was crying constantly.”

Her husband made numerous attempts to persuade his mother to change her behaviour, but in the end, they were forced to physically remove her from the house and send her back home. Accordingly, OP’s grandmother and brother-in-law (BIL) were also required to depart from the premises. OP disclosed that her father would typically care the kid during the week, which annoyed MIL because she believed it was unfair to her relationship with the baby.

Given that she lived an hour and a half away from OP’s residence, her complaint was completely incomprehensible. OP and her husband were subjected to harassment by the MIL for a period of several months before they finally gave her permission to watch her granddaughter every Wednesday at their own flat.

When the person who posted on Reddit received a call from her brother-in-law, she was in the middle of her shift at work the day before she posted her information. He informed her that his mother had called him in a panicked manner, claiming that she had dropped her granddaughter and was concerned that the youngster had sustained major injuries.

The fact that the OP’s mother-in-law chose to phone her brother-in-law, who lives an hour and a half away from her, was aggravating to the OP. She hastily disconnected up before attempting to reach her mother-in-law seven times, but she did not receive a response. After that, she called her mother, who lives in a residential area that is closer to her own, and the mother came over right away.

The user on Reddit was in a state of panic, and she tried to get her coat while simultaneously calling her spouse. As soon as she recounted what had occurred, he became furious; nevertheless, because his shift was going to end before OP’s, he departed an hour earlier than usual and went directly home. In spite of the fact that OP’s husband was able to contact his mother on the phone, she was rapidly disintegrating and becoming confused.

When he and OP’s mother arrived at the same time, they discovered the mother-in-law crying on the couch. Fortunately, the baby, who was six months old at the time, was unharmed, with the exception of a cut and a bruise under her eye. Even though she was in a bouncer, the toddler couldn’t help but giggle at her grandmother’s tears.

The situation was resolved, the doctors were consulted, and the mother-in-law was dismissed. At one point, the MIL called the OP in an attempt to explain, but the OP interrupted her and informed her that she would no longer be responsible for watching over her granddaughter. Before making the decision, the woman who was a mother to one had already conferred with her husband.

The older woman was left inconsolable after the OP informed her mother-in-law that she was unable to handle the infant on her alone or in an emergency situation. The mother-in-law was now informing everybody who would listen that they would never again permit her to visit her grandchild on any occasion. OP made it clear that her mother-in-law in possession of the phone number of her paediatrician as well as the direct line to the local fire department.

In the event that the elderly lady was unable to locate the numbers, she clarified that they were displayed prominently on the refrigerator. It was also revealed by the younger woman that her mother-in-law was not fully prohibited from seeing her grandchild; rather, it was only that it could not take place without supervision.

OP made the statement that in order for her and her husband to entirely remove their mother-in-law from their granddaughter’s lives, it would require a huge event. Fortunately, users of Reddit believed that the original poster was not in the wrong in this scenario.

After insinuating that her son’s girlfriend is cheating on her, a woman insists on having DNA tests done

In a similar account, a user on Reddit who was 21 years old said that she had her kid, Ben, when she was just 16 years old. She revealed that she and Ben’s father had broke up not long after the birth of their child, but that they continued to communicate with one another, and that Ben’s father continued to see him on a regular basis.

At the age of 19, she began a romantic relationship with her present partner, Tom. Shortly after the couple began their relationship, she became pregnant with Tom’s inaugural kid. There was a time when Tom’s mother paid her a visit by herself and made an offer of £5,000 ($6,280) to leave with the baby without letting her son know about it.

OP did not accept the agreement, but she also did not disclose to her partner what has been said by his mother. Tom, on the other hand, found out the truth when she was 36 weeks pregnant, and the two of them discussed it with his mother. The more experienced mother explained to her son that she was aware that the infant was not his, stating that Ben was the child’s because OP was constantly in his presence.

After that, Tom’s mother made a commitment to conduct a paternity test on the baby by DNA testing it. At the time, the individual in question believed that the threat was made in the heat of the moment; but, when she went into labour at 38 weeks, the mother of her boyfriend surreptitiously conducted a DNA test on their child a week later.

According to the findings, the child was indeed Tom’s. At the time that she was making her post on Reddit, OP said that she was thirty weeks pregnant with Tom’s second child, and that they were aware that the child was a boy, whom they chose to name Elliot. Continuing with the same line of reasoning as before, the mother of her lover asserted that her son was not Elliot’s biological father.

Tom and OP came to an agreement that they would not allow the older woman to interact with any of the children now. Nevertheless, the remaining members of Tom’s family are now asserting that they are demonstrating that the woman is correct by not conducting the DNA test. The original poster (OP) wanted to know if she was exaggerating anything, and she was also justified by the readers of Reddit.

There is a rift between siblings as a result of the adoption of one of them

An individual who uses Reddit disclosed in the following article that she and her husband are the parents of two children: a daughter named Julia who is five years old and a son named Malcolm who is eight years old. OP made the decision that she was not prepared to go through the ordeal of giving birth to her son again after she had a painful birth with her son.

The decision to adopt their daughter was made five years ago, and it was made because she and her husband still desired to have more children. OP disclosed that her mother-in-law is concerned about her family, but it is evident that she has a predilection for Malcolm. When she learned that the couple would not have another biological kid, the mother-in-law was incensed and disapproved of the situation.

When the older woman found out that they were intending to adopt a child, she immediately became enraged and began yelling over the fact that the parents were unaware of the child’s biological parents. The mother-in-law was concerned that they might wind up raising a child that would bring shame to her family, but her son soon put her mind at ease, and the other person added:

“Thankfully, when she saw little Julia, it seemed like this was all behind us.”

One day prior to the post that was made by the OP, her mother-in-law paid a visit to her while her son was away on a trip. The elder woman assisted with various tasks. The mother of two was worn out and requested to take a sleep, which the mother-in-law was willing to accommodate. OP was roused from her sleep by her mother-in-law, who informed her that she was ready to depart.

The only thing that was wrong was that OP was cooking, but all of a sudden, she heard a huge bang, and then Julia started weeping. As soon as she rushed into the hallway, she noticed Malcolm towering over his sister and yelling at her:

“You shouldn’t be real! I am the owner of everything!

The sight left OP in a state of profound bewilderment. Prior to inquiring about the meaning of her son’s words, the mom was successful in calming down the children. The young child revealed to her that his grandma had told him that he was his parents’ “real son,” which caused his mother to get enraged.

She mentioned that she had individually and collectively discussed the matter with her children.

Malcolm stated that the elder woman disclosed that Julia was not his sister. She asked the youngster to discuss what else his grandma had told him, and he claimed that their grandmother had informed him. As a result of his “extra special” status, the boy’s grandma told him that he would always be her favourite grandchild and that he deserved particular attention because of this.

As a result of her anger, the OP wrote a text message to her mother-in-law, in which she informed her that her acts were inappropriate and that she would never see her grandchildren until they were much older. She then proceeded to block the older woman from everything. Her mother-in-law was informed by the mother of two that the children would only visit her when they were unable to be swayed by the words that she spoke.

After some time had passed, she saw that she had been overreacting to the elderly woman. Following his return, she and her husband got into a heated dispute, during which he expressed his disagreement with her choice. OP said that her husband has a deep affection for his mother and informed her that it would be inhumane to prevent the parent from coming to visit her grandchildren.

She was defended by him, who stated that she is a traditionalist and that she was unaware that her statements would have such a significant impact. It was determined that the pair will have a courteous conversation about the subject at a later time. It was mentioned by OP in an update that her children were aware of the fact that Julia is adopted.

She mentioned that she had individually and collectively discussed the matter with her children. OP believed that it might be necessary for her to have the chat with them once again in order to make sure that Julia is aware that the fact that she is adopted does not make her any less a member of the family. The users of Reddit were on her side this time at least.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *